Regulatory Optimization of Bitcoin as Collateral: Property Classification and Secured Lending Framework in Indonesia

Authors

  • Kevin Darmawan Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Lastuti Abubakar Lecturer in the Legal Studies Program, Padjadjaran University
  • Tri Handayani Lecturer in the Legal Studies Program, Padjadjaran University
  • Dewi Kania Sugiharti Lecturer in the Legal Studies Program, Padjadjaran University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1738

Keywords:

Bitcoin, Digital Asset, Collateral

Abstract

The development of financial technology has driven the emergence of digital assets such as Bitcoin, which challenge the conventional legal framework of property law. Although not recognized as legal tender, Bitcoin has been acknowledged as a legal asset by Indonesia's Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (Bappebti). This study aims to examine the legal status of Bitcoin as collateral in Indonesia’s property law framework, as well as assess the adequacy of current regulations in accommodating this function. This research employs a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach and deductive reasoning. The findings indicate that Bitcoin fulfills the legal criteria of an intangible object and, in theory, can be used as an object of fiduciary security. However, the absence of explicit legal recognition and a digitally integrated collateral registration system has led to legal uncertainty. Although regulations in Indonesia have provided a degree of legality and oversight, systemic institutional integration remains lacking. Therefore, legal reform is needed in the area of digital asset-based collateral, along with the establishment of a comprehensive administrative registration system to ensure the validity of security interests in digital assets

References

Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 23/6/PBI/2021 on Payment Service Providers.

Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (Bappebti), Regulation No. 8 of 2021 in conjunction with Regulation No. 9 of 2024.

Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (Bappebti), Regulation No. 9 of 2024.

Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (Bappebti), Regulation No. 11 of 2022 in conjunction with Regulation No. 9 of 2024.

Dahris Siregar, Sri Wahyuni, Noni Elvina Br. Surbakti, et al., “Analisis legalitas aset kripto sebagai obyek jaminan di Indonesia,” Jurnal Yuridis, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2024.

Djodi Udayana, Lastuti Abubakar, and Tri Handayani, “Enforcement of Regulation for the Electronic Money in Indonesia in Order to Mitigate the Risk of Default Due to Insolvency”, SRAC, Vol. 23, No. 191, 2022.

European Parliament and Council of the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA). Retrieved on March 28, 2025, from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32023R1114.

Financial Services Authority (OJK), Circular Letter No. 20/SEOJK.07/2024 concerning the Implementation of Digital Financial Asset Trading Including Crypto Assets.

Giancarlo Giudici, Alistair Milne, and Dmitri Vinogradov, “Cryptocurrencies: Market Analysis and Perspectives,” Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2020.

Gunawan A. Tauda, Andy Omara, and Gioia Arnone, “Cryptocurrency: Highlighting the Approach, Regulations, and Protection in Indonesia and European Union,” Bestuur, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2023.

Jimly Asshiddiqie Ibrahim, Theory and Method of Normative Legal Research, Malang: Bayu Media Publishing, 2006.

Katarzyna ?ledziewska and Renata W?och, “Digital Ownership and Legal Certainty in Blockchain,” Digital Economy Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2022.

Lastuti Abubakar and Tri Handayani, “Digital Assets: The Idea of Indonesian Property Law Reform and Its Potential as a Collateral Object,” Hasanuddin Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2019.

Law No. 7 of 2011 on Currency (Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2011 tentang Mata Uang).

Moch. Isnaeni, Hukum Benda dalam Burgerlijk Wetboek, Surabaya: Revka Petra Media, 2016.

Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Nusa Tenggara Barat: Tim Mataram University Press, 2020.

Munir Fuady, Hukum Jaminan Utang, Jakarta: Erlangga, 2013.

Nanda Dwi Rizkia, Legal Research Methods, Bandung: Universitas Padjadjaran, 2021.

Paraskevi Katsiampa, Larisa Yarovaya, and Damian Zi?ba, “High-Frequency Connectedness between Bitcoin and Other Top-Traded Crypto Assets during the COVID-19 Crisis,” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Vol. 79, 2022.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.

Rilda Murniati and M. Daffa Razwa Ramadhan, A Normative Legal Analysis of Crypto Assets as Collateral for Debt in Indonesia. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 19(1), 21–38, 2025.

Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Retrieved on March 20, 2025, from: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.

Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2012.

Sri Budi Purwaningsih, Hukum Jaminan dan Agunan Kredit, Sidoarjo: Umsida Press, 2021.

Subekti, Hukum Benda, Jakarta: PT Intermasa, 2004.

Tiara Amanda Putri, “The Legality of Bitcoin under Indonesian Law,” Hukumonline.com. Retrieved on March 28, 2025, from: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/legalitas-bitcoin-menurut-hukum-indonesia-lt5a1e13e9c9fc4.

Zaeni Asyhadie and Rahma Kusumawati, Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia: Kajian Berdasarkan Hukum Nasional dan Prinsip Ekonomi Syariah, Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-19

How to Cite

Darmawan, K., Abubakar, L., Handayani, T., & Sugiharti, D. K. (2025). Regulatory Optimization of Bitcoin as Collateral: Property Classification and Secured Lending Framework in Indonesia. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(4), 3198–3212. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1738