Legal Certainty For The Judiciary That Is Authorized To Adjudicate Corruption Cases That Occurred In Basarnas RI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2419Keywords:
Authority, Adjudication, CorruptionAbstract
Article 42 of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law grants the KPK (Corruption Eradication Commission) coordinating authority to oversee the investigation, inquiry, and prosecution of corruption crimes jointly committed by legal subjects under the jurisdiction of both military and general courts. The normative juridical research method, as a legal research approach, bases its analysis on literature review or secondary data sources as the primary foundation of the study, conducted through an in-depth examination of legal regulations and various literature references relevant to the issue under review. Based on an analysis of the relevant statutory provisions, it can be concluded that the Basarnas corruption case involving military personnel should be adjudicated by the Corruption Court, with several legal considerations. The Corruption Court is the competent body to try corruption cases within the National Search and Rescue Agency of the Republic of Indonesia, while maintaining institutional coordination between the KPK and the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) as mandated by the Constitutional Court's decision. An in-depth analysis of the applicable statutory provisions indicates that the legal provisions regarding jurisdiction over corruption cases involving military personnel have undergone a paradigmatic shift from a personal jurisdiction approach to a subject matter jurisdiction approach. Based on this ruling, and considering that the Basarnas corruption case was initially investigated and discovered by the KPK, the Corruption Court is the competent body to adjudicate the case, including that of Air Marshal Henri Alfiandi as an active member of the TNI.
References
Collina, Amanah Abdi. “Kewenangan Kominsi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Kpk) Dalam Mengadili Tindak Pidana Korupsi Anggota Tni Yang Menduduki Jabatan Sipil.” B.S. Thesis, Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum Uin Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, n.d. Accessed August 14, 2025. Https://Repository.Uinjkt.Ac.Id/Dspace/Handle/123456789/83905.
Fitri Wahyuni. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. PT Nusantara Persada Utama, 2017.
Lisnawaty W. Badu And Apripari. Menggagas Tindak Pidana Militer Sebagai Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Militer Dalam Perkara Pidana. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, n.d.
Lumban Gaol, Yulinda Regina C., Alvi Syahrir, Edy Ikhsan, And Wessy Trisna. “Kewenangan Kpk Untuk Menyidik Anggota Tni Bersama-Sama Dengan Sipil Secara Koneksitas.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik (Jihhp) 4, No. 4 (2024). Https://Search.Ebscohost.Com/Login.Aspx?Direct=True&Profile=Ehost&Scope=Site&Authtype=Crawler&Jrnl=27472000&An=178471989&h=Qlnjvkfzgstpxqhdnxy55Gwctusymx%2Bysfjwi429bvpgwyzt75Jx93Msprwerxm4vehsfcmdwqyhvu0f3%2Fjamq%3D%3D&Crl=c.
Napitupulu, Stefanus Sunggul H. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Klausul Non Kompetisi Dengan Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 31/Pdt. G/2022/Pntng.” Phd Thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, 2023. Http://Repository.Uki.Ac.Id/10365/.
Novantoro, Dwi. “Kepastian Hukum Peradilan Koneksitas Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Adijaya Multidisplin 3, No. 02 (2025): 170–84.
Rodliyah. Hukum Pidana Khusus Unur Dan Sanksi Pidananya. Rajawali Pres, 2021.
Rusadi Kantaprawira. Hukum Dan Kekuasaan, Gyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia. Pt. Sangir Multi Usaha, 2022.
Simanjuntak, Frengki Raja. “Kajian Hukum Pidana Terhadap Kepala Basarnas Pelaku Korupsi.” Phd Thesis, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, 2024. Https://Repository.Uajy.Ac.Id/Id/Eprint/32013/.
Soerjono Soekanto. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Ui Press, 2008.
Tempo. Kronologi Polemik Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Terkait Kasus Dugaan Suap Di Basarnas. 2023.
Umam, Ardinta Hidayatul, And Jurusan Hukum Tata Negara. Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Penetapan Tersangka Kasus Korupsi Prajurit Tentara Nasional Indonesia Aktif Perspektif Fiqh Siya< Sah. n.d. Accessed August 14, 2025. Https://Etheses.Iainponorogo.Ac.Id/30287/1/Ardinta%20Hidayatul%20U.Pdf.
Wati, Rani Yohana. “Tinjauan Normatif Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Tipikor Yang Dilakukan Oleh Tni: Studi Kasus Basarnas Ri.” Sumbang12 Law Journal 2, No. 2 (2024): 66–78.
Zahra, Elsa Az. Penerapan Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Militer Tinggi Dalam Mengadili Purnawirawan Tni Pada Perkara Koneksitas Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Prinsip Kepastian Dan Persamaan Hukum (Studi Putusan Nomor 44-K/Koneksitas/Pmt-Ii/Ad/Viii/2022). n.d. Accessed August 14, 2025. Https://Repository.Unsri.Ac.Id/173625/24/Rama_74201_02011182126029_0021026805_0218119002_01_Front_Ref.Pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Reza Alamsyah Putra, Zarisnov Arafat, Muhamad Abas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
