Unilateral Termination Of Employment (PHK) By PT. Pong Codan Indonesia (PCI) As Reviewed In The Connection With Government Regulation Number 35 Of 2021 Concerning Fixed-Term Employment Agreements, Outsourcing, Working Hours And Rest Hours, And Termination

Authors

  • Dicky Muhammad Gibran Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
  • Muhamad Abas Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
  • Yuniar Rahmatiar Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3380

Keywords:

Unilateral Termination, Fixed-Term Employment Contract, Worker Legal Protection.

Abstract

Unilateral termination of employment constitutes a fundamental issue in industrial relations, reflecting the imbalance of bargaining power between employers and workers. The state intervenes through labor regulations, particularly Law Number 6 of 2023 on the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation as Law and Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 concerning Fixed-Term Employment Agreements, Outsourcing, Working Time and Rest Time, and Termination of Employment, to ensure legal protection for workers. This study examines how termination of employment is regulated under Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 and how the panel of judges considered unilateral termination cases in Decision Number 16/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2025/PN Bdg. The research employs a qualitative method with a normative legal approach through literature study of statutory regulations and court decisions. Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 regulates termination of employment comprehensively as a last resort with strict procedures. In Decision Number 16/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2025/PN Bdg, the panel of judges declared that the fixed-term employment agreement had transformed into an indefinite-term employment agreement and that the termination was null and void. However, a contradiction arises as the employment relationship was ultimately terminated on grounds of efficiency solely based on Article 100 of Law Number 2 of 2004 without considering Constitutional Court Decision Number 19/PUU-IX/2011, whereas the efficiency provisions within that Constitutional Court Decision cannot justify the termination of employment of the Plaintiffs whose status had been established as indefinite-term, thus the legal basis employed was inaccurate and entirely without juridical foundation, ultimately failing to provide optimal legal protection for workers.

References

Agus Wibowo. 2024. Hukum Perburuhan. (Semarang: Universitas STEKOM).

Arifuddin Muda Harahap. 2023. Konflik Ketenagakerjaan Dalam Pertambangan Peran Filsafat Hukum Dalam Penyelesaiannya. (Bandung: CV. Media Sains Indonesia).

---------------. 2020. Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. (Malang: CV. Lterasi Nuantara Abadi).

Asep Rudi Gunawan, dkk, “Kepastian Hukum terhadap Tenaga Kerja PKWT yang Dipekerjakan Kembali Setelah 5 Tahun Masa Kontrak Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021”, Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, Vol. 5, No. 5, (2024).

Asri Wijayanti. 2018. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Pasca Reformasi. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika).

Deby Ayu Fauziah, “Pembatasan Hak Pekerja Dalam Proses Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Dihubungkan Dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja Dan Waktu Istirahat, Dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja”, Jurnal Realitas Hukum: Vol. 2 No.1, (2026).

Devi Rahayu. dkk. 2020. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan: Konsep dan Pengaturan dalam Omnibus Law. (Malang: Setara Press)

Ida Hanifah. 2020. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. (Medan: Pustaka Prima).

Ikhwan Fahrojih. 2016. Hukum Perburuhan: Konsepsi, Sejarah, Dan Jaminan Konstitusional. (Malang: Setara Press).

M. Gary Gagarin Akbar & Deny Guntara, “Analisis Hukum Dampak Kenaikan Upah Minimum Terhadap Eksistensi Perusahaan Di Kabupaten Karawang”, Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 16 No. 1, (2019).

Muhamad Abas, “Analisis Pelanggaran Pembayaran Upah Minimum (Studi Putusan No. 401/pid.b/2012/PN.bwi)”, Jurnal Justisi Hukum: Vol. 2, No. 1, (2017).

Muhamad Abas, Yuniar Rahmatiar & Wahyu Mulyandaru, “Analisis Risalah Perundingan Terhadap Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK) Akibat Mogok Kerja Tidak Sah di PT Adyawinsa Stamping Industries (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Nomor 96/Pdt.Sus- PHI/2015/PN BDG jo. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 740k/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2015)”, Jurnal Justisi Hukum Vol. 7, No. 2, (2022).

Muhamad Padilah, Yuniar Rahmatiar & Muhamad Abas, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Pekerja Yang Tidak Dibayarkan Dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja: Dalam Perspektif Hukum Ketenagakerjaan”, HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum Volume 4, No. 2, (2024)

Nur Solikin. 2021. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, (Pasuruan: CV. Penerbit Qiara Media).

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja Dan Waktu Istirahat, Dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 19/PUU-IX/2011.

Simanjuntak & Payaman J. 2020. Pengantar Ekonomi Sumber Daya Manusia. (Jakarta: FE UI Press)

Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial.

Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Tentang Cipta Kerja Menjadi Undang-Undang.

Zaeni Asyhadie. dkk. 2016. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perburuhan, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada).

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Muhammad Gibran, D., Abas, M., & Rahmatiar, Y. (2026). Unilateral Termination Of Employment (PHK) By PT. Pong Codan Indonesia (PCI) As Reviewed In The Connection With Government Regulation Number 35 Of 2021 Concerning Fixed-Term Employment Agreements, Outsourcing, Working Hours And Rest Hours, And Termination. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(4), 3030–3039. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3380

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>