Testing the Limits of Good Faith: The Consistency of Business Judgment Rule Standards in Criminal Adjudication Compared to Article 97(5) of the Indonesian Company Law (A Study of Supreme Court Decisions No. 121K/Pid.Sus/2020 and No. 1401K/Pid.Sus/2014)

Authors

  • Rayhan Qeis Thufeil Lubis Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Satino Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3569

Keywords:

Business Judgment Rule, Good Faith, Article 97(5) of UUPT, BUMN Directors, Legal Certainty

Abstract

This research compares Supreme Court Decision No. 121 K/Pid.Sus/2020 and Decision No. 1401 K/Pid.Sus/2014 to examine whether Indonesian courts apply a consistent standard of good faith under Article 97(5) of Law No. 40 of 2007 when the Business Judgment Rule is raised as a defense in criminal cases involving state-owned enterprise directors. Using a normative legal research method, this research finds that the two panels applied fundamentally different approaches, with neither decision applying all four conditions of Article 97(5). This inconsistency reveals that the provision offers no reliable protection in practice due to the absence of a written and measurable standard of good faith. This research recommends a legislative amendment to Article 97(5) and a formal Supreme Court ruling to ensure consistent application.

References

Addinda, Z. R., Syadzwina, D. N., & Fausta, M. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Direksi BUMN dalam Perspektif Corporate Governance Atas Kerugian Keuangan Negara.

Ahwan, A., & Ristansti, Y. (2025). The scope of state finances and their implications for combating corruption in Indonesia. Priviet Social Sciences Journal, 5(12), 502–513. https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i12.1191

Alfadani, A., & Bayuaji, R. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Direksi BUMN atas Keputusan Bisnis Ditinjau dari Aspek Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 4(5).

Alfiansyah, A., Zumrotussaadah, M. D., & Hamid, H. S. A. (2025). Business Judgment Rule dan Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Dalam Kejahatan Korporasi Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia–Amerika Serikat.

Arifin, A. P. S., & Sodikin, S. (2025). Penerapan Prinsip Fiduciary Duty Untuk Mewujudkan Good Corporate Governance Dalam Perseroan Terbatas. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies, 2(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i2.3583

Art, S. M., & Lie, G. (2025). The Legal Liability of Directors in State-Owned Enterprises: An Analysis of Judicial Inconsistencies in the Application of the Business Judgment Rule Doctrine: Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Direksi Perusahaan Milik Pemerintah: Analisis Perbedaan Putusan Hakim dalam Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1386

Bainbridge, S. M. (2003). The Business Judgment Rule as Abstention Doctrine. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.429260

Branson, D. M. (2002). The Rule That Isn’t a Rule—The Business Judgment Rule. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.346080

DeMott, D. A. (1992). Directors’ Duty of Care and the Business Judgment Rule: American Precedents and Australian Choices. Bond Law Review, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.5221

Faqih Zuhdi Rahman. (2026). Batasan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Direksi BUMN dalam Perspektif Business Judgment Rule Pasca Revisi UU BUMN: Limits of Criminal Liability of SOE Directors under the Business Judgment Rule after SOE Law Revision. Semarang Law Review (SLR), 7(1), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.26623/slr.v7i1.13983

Farhan, G. M., Ahmad, M., & Intihani, S. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Aspek Itikad Tidak Baik Dalam Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgement Rule Yang Dilakukan Oleh Direksi Perusahaan Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie, 7(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.34005/jhj.v6i2.158

Firmansyah, A., Machmud, A., & Suparji, S. (2024). Peran BUMN sebagai Pilar Utama Ekonomi Nasional yang Mandiri: Sebuah Kajian Hukum Korporasi. Binamulia Hukum, 13(2), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.952

Hafizh Akram, M., & Primadani Fanaro, N. (2019). IMPLEMENTASI DOKTRIN BUSINESS JUDGEMENT RULE DI INDONESIA. Ganesha Law Review, 1(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.23887/glr.v1i1.21

Mahyani, A. (2019). TANGGUNG JAWAB PIDANA DIREKSI BUMN YANG MERUGI. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v2i1.2309

Marune, A. E. M. S. (2021). Criminal Liability of Indonesia’s State-Owned Enterprise Directors for Acts That Cause State Financial Losses. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v1i2.25

Nurhayati, S. (2026). THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE AS LEGAL PROTECTION FOR DIRECTORS IN BUSINESS DECISION-MAKING.

Sesara, G. W. (2020). KONSEP PENERAPAN PRINSIP BUSINESS JUDGEMENT RULE PADA KEPUTUSAN DIREKSI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA (BUMN). 1.

Setiawati, A. D., & Gisa Vitrana, M. (2025). Doktrin Business Judgment Rule dalam UU BUMN: Batas Tanggung Jawab Direksi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. JURNAL RECHTENS, 14(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.56013/rechtens.v14i1.4256

Silitonga, E. F., Sunarmi, & Siregar, M. (2022). Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgment Rule Terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Perdata Direksi Perseroan: Analisis Putusan No.915 K/Pdt/2017 dan No.83/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Sby. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v2i2.25

Zulfikar, R. N., & Muryanto, Y. T. (2025). BUSINESS JUDGEMENT RULE KAITANNYA SEBAGAI UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI DIREKSI DALAM PENGELOLAAN INVESTASI BUMN. 13.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-11

How to Cite

Lubis, R. Q. T., & Satino, S. (2026). Testing the Limits of Good Faith: The Consistency of Business Judgment Rule Standards in Criminal Adjudication Compared to Article 97(5) of the Indonesian Company Law (A Study of Supreme Court Decisions No. 121K/Pid.Sus/2020 and No. 1401K/Pid.Sus/2014). Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(5), 4230–4241. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3569