Juridical Analysis of Errors in Recording the Origin of Land on Land Management Rights by the National Land Agency

Authors

  • Josie Jayasaputra Kusmayadi Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Benny Djaja Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.839

Keywords:

Land Rights, Certificate, Management Rights

Abstract

Soil functions as the surface layer of the earth that supports plant roots' growth, supports upright plants and meets water and air needs. The importance of land for humans is very clear, because humans cannot live without land. Therefore, land registration becomes increasingly important for society as time goes by. The land registration process produces legal consequences, namely the issuance of a land certificate which functions as legal and strong evidence for the holder of rights to the land. However, with the large number of certificates issued by the National Land Agency (BPN), the possibility of errors in the certificate issuance process remains, even though the chance of such errors occurring is small. One error that may occur is an error in recording the origin of land over management rights, as illustrated in the Decision of the State Administrative Court for Judicial Review Number 206/PK/TUN/2023. This research uses normative juridical research methods. Errors or omissions in issuing a certificate can cause the certificate to become invalid, either due to inaccurate data on the legal subject or legal object stated in the certificate. These errors can occur at various stages of land registration. Adding phrases such as "Above HPL No. 1/Jatinegara” can affect the meaning and legal consequences for PT ABC as the legal owner of the land. The existence of provisions regarding certificates and land rights is a preventive step to protect land rights and prevent disputes. For repressive legal protection, which is applied after a dispute occurs, the aim is to resolve the conflict. If a land dispute arises, repressive legal protection can take the form of restoring rights to the original owner of the land

References

Chandra, S, Sertipikat Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah: Persyaratan Permohonan di Kantor Pertanahan, (Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, 2005).

Harahap, Yahya, Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005).

Harsono, Boedi, Hukum Agraria Indonesia Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya, (Jakarta: Djambatan, 2003).

Hutagulung, Arie Sukanti, Kewenangan Pemerintah di Bidang Pertanahan, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2009).

Nazir, Mohamad, Metode Penelitian, (Bogor: Ghalia, 2013).

Nurlinda, Ida, Prinsip-Prinsip Pembaharuan Agraria : Perspektif Hukum, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2009).

Santoso, Urip, Pendaftaran dan Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah, (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group, 2010).

Sunggono, Bambang, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2009).

Sutedi, Adrian, Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Pendaftarannya, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013).

Putranto, M Ilham Dwi dan Amin Mansyur, “Urgensi Penerapan Sertipikat Tanah Secara Elektronik”, Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2023.

Rizqi, Andina Alfia dan Yusriadi, “Perlidungan Hukum Pemilik Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Hal Terjadi Kesalahan Data Penerbitannya (Studi Kasus Di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Semarang)”, Jurnal Notarius, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2018.

Santoso, Urip, “Eksistensi Hak Pengelolaan Dalam Hukum Tanah Nasional”, Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2012.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-18

How to Cite

Josie Jayasaputra Kusmayadi, & Benny Djaja. (2024). Juridical Analysis of Errors in Recording the Origin of Land on Land Management Rights by the National Land Agency. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(1), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.839

Most read articles by the same author(s)